Aerospace

The backlog grew $96bn while the company was still losing money

Total company backlog at each quarter end, US$ billions.

← Back to Boeing’s Recovery, Quarter by Quarter

About this data

Total backlog rose from $619bn at the end of Q2 2025 to $715.3bn at the end of Q2 2026 — a record at every one of the five observations. Commercial Airplanes carries $596.7bn of the Q2 2026 total, Defense $85.3bn and Global Services $32.8bn. This is the single strongest argument that Boeing’s problem was never demand: customers kept ordering through the cap, the strike and the losses. It is also the reason the recovery is measured in production rate rather than in sales. A backlog that grows while deliveries grow means the company is selling faster than it can build, which converts every rate increase directly into revenue rather than into a fight for orders.

The backlog grew $96bn while the company was still losing money

The backlog grew $96bn while the company was still losing money

Total company backlog at each quarter end, US$ billions.

View data & sources →

Data table

The backlog grew $96bn while the company was still losing money — backlog_growth data table (Boeing’s Recovery, Quarter by Quarter)
series usd_bn quarter source_ref value_basis
backlog_growth 619 Q2 2025 boeing-q2-2025 "Total Company Backlog: $619 billion"
backlog_growth 636 Q3 2025 boeing-q3-2025 "Total backlog: $636 billion"
backlog_growth 682 Q4 2025 boeing-q4-2025 "Total Backlog: Record $682 billion"
backlog_growth 695 Q1 2026 boeing-q1-2026 "Total Backlog: $695 billion", record level
backlog_growth 715.3 Q2 2026 boeing-q2-2026 "Total Company Backlog: $715.3 billion"

Methodology & sources

Last updated: Aug 14, 2026

Methodology

This index answers one question: is Boeing’s recovery real, and where is it still not? It is built entirely from Boeing’s own quarterly releases plus one external source for the FAA rate-cap dates, and it deliberately contains no Airbus comparison — that is /data/narrowbody-deliveries. BASIS. All cash-flow figures are free cash flow as Boeing defines it (non-GAAP: operating cash flow less capital expenditure). All margins are segment operating margin as reported. Backlog is total company backlog, not Commercial Airplanes alone. Deliveries are commercial aircraft only; Defense deliveries are excluded throughout. DERIVED POINT — DISCLOSED. Q1 2025 free cash flow of $(2.3)bn is the only derived value in this index. It is H1 2025 free cash flow of $(2.5)bn less the Q2 2025 figure of $(0.2)bn, both published in the same release. Cross-check: the Q3 2025 release gives nine-month free cash flow of $(2.252)bn, which less the Q3 figure of +$238m returns H1 of $(2.490)bn — consistent with the stated $(2.5)bn to rounding. The derivation is written into the point’s value_basis. OMITTED. Q1 2025 deliveries are not stated in the releases retrieved and are not derivable from a published nine-month total on the same basis. The quarter is absent from the delivery chart rather than interpolated. CONFLICT — DROPPED, NOT SEEDED. The full-year 2025 release returned a Global Services operating margin that cannot be reconciled with the 18.1% quarterly figures on either side of it or with the segment’s history. It is treated as unreliable. Full-year segment margins are therefore omitted from this index entirely; only the two 2026 quarters, which are mutually consistent, are charted. CAVEAT — 52 A MONTH IS A TARGET. The final bar of the rate-path chart is a stated next step with no published FAA approval and no announced date. It is labelled as a target in the subtitle and in the point’s value_basis. The 38 and 42 figures are regulatory caps; the 42 and 47 figures are production rates Boeing reported. Caps and rates are not the same measure and the chart’s x-axis labels say which is which. CAVEAT — PRODUCTION RATE IS NOT DELIVERY RATE. Boeing has been drawing down parked inventory over this period, so quarterly deliveries have at times exceeded the production rate. Do not read the rate chart as a delivery forecast. CAVEAT — SEASONALITY. Boeing consumes cash in Q1 and generates it later in the year. The Q1 2026 outflow of $(1.5)bn is a seasonal pattern visible in 2025 as well, not necessarily a relapse. Equally, the positive quarters do not mean the annual figure has turned: full-year 2025 free cash flow was still $(1.9)bn against $(14.3)bn in 2024. Compiled and verified 2026-08-14. Working sheet with every source passage: Topics_Content/data/batch-6_aerospace_2026-08-14.md

Comparisons are informative, not definitive. See each source for definitions and limits.

How relevant was this information?