Insurance

What did 2024 catastrophes actually cost insurers?

Global insured natural-catastrophe losses for 2024, $ billions, by estimating body.

← Back to Insured Catastrophe Losses

About this data

Four published figures for one year, spanning $137bn to $154bn — a 12% range. Two of them are Swiss Re’s own: $137bn as originally published, $141bn as later restated. Munich Re independently lands at $140bn, clustering three estimates near $140bn, while Gallagher Re’s wider event scope puts it at $154bn. The $137bn figure is by far the most widely quoted, and is no longer the current one.

What did 2024 catastrophes actually cost insurers?

What did 2024 catastrophes actually cost insurers?

Global insured natural-catastrophe losses for 2024, $ billions, by estimating body.

View data & sources →

Data table

What did 2024 catastrophes actually cost insurers? — provider_spread data table (Insured Catastrophe Losses)
usd_b series provider source_ref value_basis
137 provider_spread Swiss Re (as first published) swissre-sigma-1-2025 Swiss Re sigma originally published 2024 global insured nat-cat losses at USD 137bn — the most widely quoted figure
140 provider_spread Munich Re munichre-140 Munich Re estimates 2024 insured nat-cat losses at USD 140bn (economic losses USD 320bn)
141 provider_spread Swiss Re (restated) swissre-2025-pr Swiss Re uses USD 141bn as the 2024 base when reporting 2025 at USD 107bn, a stated 24% decline (107 ÷ 141 − 1 = −24.1%)
154 provider_spread Gallagher Re gallagherre-154 Gallagher Re: insurers covered USD 154bn of USD 417bn total 2024 economic losses — wider event scope

Methodology & sources

Last updated: Aug 14, 2026

Methodology

Insured losses only — the portion of catastrophe damage covered by insurance, always far below total economic loss (Gallagher Re put 2024 economic losses at $417bn against $154bn insured; Munich Re at $320bn against $140bn). The difference is the protection gap. THE 2024 NUMBER IS CONTESTED, and two of the four figures are Swiss Re’s own. $137bn is what Swiss Re originally published and remains by far the most widely quoted. $141bn is the restated basis Swiss Re itself uses when reporting 2025 at $107bn as "a 24% decline" (107 ÷ 141 − 1 = −24.1%, which only works from 141). Munich Re independently lands at $140bn. Gallagher Re’s $154bn reflects a wider event scope, not a different view of the same events. The annual trend chart uses Swiss Re’s CURRENT basis ($141bn for 2024) so it is internally consistent with the 2025 figure beside it. The provider-spread chart exists so that choice is visible rather than silent. OMITTED: the commonly cited $118bn for 2023 is a TREND value, not an actual, and is not plotted alongside actuals. CAVEAT: the 2025 forecast-vs-actual chart compares a trend projection ($145bn) with an outcome ($107bn). The 35% overshoot is not a modelling failure — sigma projects a trend line, not any particular year’s weather, and one quiet hurricane season moves the outcome far more than the trend does. Re-verified 2026-08-10.

Comparisons are informative, not definitive. See each source for definitions and limits.

How relevant was this information?