Insured Catastrophe Losses

What natural catastrophes cost insurers — the annual trend, the gap between estimating bodies, and how far the 2025 forecast missed.

Curated snapshot Last updated: Aug 14, 2026 8 data points
What did 2024 catastrophes actually cost insurers?

What did 2024 catastrophes actually cost insurers?

Global insured natural-catastrophe losses for 2024, $ billions, by estimating body.

View data & sources →
Insured losses by year

Insured losses by year

Global insured natural-catastrophe losses, $ billions, on Swiss Re’s current basis.

View data & sources →
The 2025 forecast against the 2025 outcome

The 2025 forecast against the 2025 outcome

Swiss Re’s projected 2025 insured losses versus what actually materialised, $ billions.

View data & sources →

Data table

Insured Catastrophe Losses — full data table
usd_b series provider source_ref value_basis year basis
137 provider_spread Swiss Re (as first published) swissre-sigma-1-2025 Swiss Re sigma originally published 2024 global insured nat-cat losses at USD 137bn — the most widely quoted figure
140 provider_spread Munich Re munichre-140 Munich Re estimates 2024 insured nat-cat losses at USD 140bn (economic losses USD 320bn)
141 provider_spread Swiss Re (restated) swissre-2025-pr Swiss Re uses USD 141bn as the 2024 base when reporting 2025 at USD 107bn, a stated 24% decline (107 ÷ 141 − 1 = −24.1%)
154 provider_spread Gallagher Re gallagherre-154 Gallagher Re: insurers covered USD 154bn of USD 417bn total 2024 economic losses — wider event scope
141 annual_losses swissre-2025-pr Swiss Re restated 2024 basis, USD 141bn (see provider-spread chart for the USD 137bn originally published) 2024

3 more rows + CSV download

The full 8-row dataset, one-click CSV export, and the AI-ready context file are free with an account. Prefer to verify it yourself? The full methodology and sources are published below.

Methodology & sources

Last updated: Aug 14, 2026

Methodology

Insured losses only — the portion of catastrophe damage covered by insurance, always far below total economic loss (Gallagher Re put 2024 economic losses at $417bn against $154bn insured; Munich Re at $320bn against $140bn). The difference is the protection gap. THE 2024 NUMBER IS CONTESTED, and two of the four figures are Swiss Re’s own. $137bn is what Swiss Re originally published and remains by far the most widely quoted. $141bn is the restated basis Swiss Re itself uses when reporting 2025 at $107bn as "a 24% decline" (107 ÷ 141 − 1 = −24.1%, which only works from 141). Munich Re independently lands at $140bn. Gallagher Re’s $154bn reflects a wider event scope, not a different view of the same events. The annual trend chart uses Swiss Re’s CURRENT basis ($141bn for 2024) so it is internally consistent with the 2025 figure beside it. The provider-spread chart exists so that choice is visible rather than silent. OMITTED: the commonly cited $118bn for 2023 is a TREND value, not an actual, and is not plotted alongside actuals. CAVEAT: the 2025 forecast-vs-actual chart compares a trend projection ($145bn) with an outcome ($107bn). The 35% overshoot is not a modelling failure — sigma projects a trend line, not any particular year’s weather, and one quiet hurricane season moves the outcome far more than the trend does. Re-verified 2026-08-10.

Comparisons are informative, not definitive. See each source for definitions and limits.

How relevant was this information?