Cryptocurrency

Cumulative net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs

Net inflows since launch on 11 January 2024, $ billions, at published checkpoints.

← Back to US Spot Bitcoin ETF Flows

About this data

Cumulative net inflows crossed $30bn by end-2024 and $47bn by mid-2025, reaching $51.3bn. The flattening between mid-2025 and now is the story — the category has nearly stopped taking in new money on a net basis.

Cumulative net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs

Cumulative net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs

Net inflows since launch on 11 January 2024, $ billions, at published checkpoints.

View data & sources →

Data table

Cumulative net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs — cumulative_flows data table (US Spot Bitcoin ETF Flows)
usd_b series checkpoint source_ref value_basis
30 cumulative_flows End 2024 tftc-etf-flows Cumulative net inflows crossed $30bn by end-2024
47 cumulative_flows Mid 2025 tftc-etf-flows Cumulative net inflows crossed $47bn by mid-2025
51.3 cumulative_flows Latest tftc-etf-flows Total cumulative net inflows $51.3bn since trading began 11 Jan 2024

Methodology & sources

Last updated: Aug 14, 2026

Methodology

Flows are NET (creations less redemptions) for US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs since the category launched on 11 January 2024. Net flow is not the same as AUM: AUM also moves with the bitcoin price, so a fund can grow in dollar terms while losing units. THE KEY READ: IBIT’s ~$62bn cumulative inflow EXCEEDS the whole category’s $51.3bn. That is not an error in the data. It means the other US spot Bitcoin ETFs are collectively net NEGATIVE by roughly $11bn on a cumulative basis. The category headline conceals a broad withdrawal underneath a single dominant fund. CAVEAT: IBIT’s share of category AUM is reported as a RANGE (49–62%) across sources and dates. A midpoint would be a fabrication, so the range is stated here and not charted. The cumulative checkpoints are published milestones, not a continuous daily series, so the line connects dated observations rather than tracking every trading day. Re-verified 2026-08-10.

Comparisons are informative, not definitive. See each source for definitions and limits.

How relevant was this information?