Deepstory Research

US Spot Bitcoin ETF Flows

Cumulative flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs — and why one fund’s inflows exceed the entire category’s.

Curated snapshot Last updated: Aug 14, 2026 7 data points
Cumulative net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs

Cumulative net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs

Net inflows since launch on 11 January 2024, $ billions, at published checkpoints.

View data & sources →
IBIT versus the entire category

IBIT versus the entire category

Cumulative net inflows since launch, $ billions. Read the two bars together.

View data & sources →
Largest outflow events

Largest outflow events

Notable net redemptions from US spot Bitcoin ETFs, $ billions.

View data & sources →

Data table

US Spot Bitcoin ETF Flows — full data table
usd_b series checkpoint source_ref value_basis fund event
30 cumulative_flows End 2024 tftc-etf-flows Cumulative net inflows crossed $30bn by end-2024
47 cumulative_flows Mid 2025 tftc-etf-flows Cumulative net inflows crossed $47bn by mid-2025
51.3 cumulative_flows Latest tftc-etf-flows Total cumulative net inflows $51.3bn since trading began 11 Jan 2024
62 ibit_vs_field ryder-ibit-2026 IBIT ~$62bn cumulative inflows since Jan 2024 launch IBIT (BlackRock) alone
51.3 ibit_vs_field tftc-etf-flows Whole-category cumulative net inflows $51.3bn — LOWER than IBIT alone, implying the rest of the field is net negative All US spot BTC ETFs

2 more rows + CSV download

The full 7-row dataset, one-click CSV export, and the AI-ready context file are free with an account. Prefer to verify it yourself? The full methodology and sources are published below.

Create a free account Sign in

Methodology & sources

Last updated: Aug 14, 2026

Methodology

Flows are NET (creations less redemptions) for US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs since the category launched on 11 January 2024. Net flow is not the same as AUM: AUM also moves with the bitcoin price, so a fund can grow in dollar terms while losing units. THE KEY READ: IBIT’s ~$62bn cumulative inflow EXCEEDS the whole category’s $51.3bn. That is not an error in the data. It means the other US spot Bitcoin ETFs are collectively net NEGATIVE by roughly $11bn on a cumulative basis. The category headline conceals a broad withdrawal underneath a single dominant fund. CAVEAT: IBIT’s share of category AUM is reported as a RANGE (49–62%) across sources and dates. A midpoint would be a fabrication, so the range is stated here and not charted. The cumulative checkpoints are published milestones, not a continuous daily series, so the line connects dated observations rather than tracking every trading day. Re-verified 2026-08-10.

Comparisons are informative, not definitive. See each source for definitions and limits.

How relevant was this information?